Israel Uae Agreement

The Assembly of the Representatives of the Tunisian People criticized the agreement and said it was in solidarity with the Palestinian cause. [99] Dozens of people protested outside the UAE embassy in Tunis, people who burned Israeli flags and photos of UAE President Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan while supporting the Palestinian cause for independence. [100] Tunisian President Kais Saied later said Tunisia would not interfere in or oppose the deal, but that it stood with the Palestinians. [101] British Prime Minister Boris Johnson hailed the deal as a path to middle East peace and also welcomed the suspension of the annexation of territories in the West Bank. British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab and French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian expressed similar sentiments, with the former adding that it was time for direct dialogue between Israelis and Palestinians, while the latter said he would seize the opportunity to resume talks. [106] France and Germany maintained hope for a two-state solution in the agreement. [34] German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas called Israeli Foreign Minister Gabi Ashkenazi to congratulate him. [107] Ordinary Palestinians protested the deal on social media, and some also insulted the UAE. Meanwhile, Abbas Zaki, a member of Fatah`s Central Committee, called the agreement a breakdown of the Arab consensus on the management of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

He accused the UAE of betraying Arabs and Palestinians before pushing the NAP to withdraw its ambassador from the UAE, and also called on the Arab League to end the 2002 Arab peace initiative. [68] The alleged kick-off of the deal, based on MBZ`s tweet after its announcement, was to „halt Israel`s continued annexation of the Palestinian territories.“ In the summer of 2020, Abu Dhabi made it more than clear that it was trying to stop Israel`s plans for the unilateral annexation of parts of the West Bank, a move that has the potential to spark internal unrest throughout the Arab world, inflame conflicts along Israel`s northern front, and turn the coup into a two-state solution. The UAE`s opposition to annexation is not surprising, as the UAE, as a status quo power, is invested in maintaining stability and order in the region. Abu Dhabi was probably also driven by two additional (and perhaps more important) motives that have more to do with Washington than with Ramallah. According to the Emirati government, the agreement „immediately terminates“ Israeli plans to annex parts of the West Bank and offers Israel and the Palestinians the opportunity to renew negotiations aimed at ending their conflict. Israeli officials use the word „suspend.“ The difference in language represents the politics faced by the leader of each country. In the case of the UAE, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed was clearly forced to show that normal relations with the UAE were not free for Israelis.

About the author: admin