Your agent looks remarkably cool, what tenants who shouldn`t do – his experience should tell him that the likelihood of tenants doing what is necessary to get the property back in order at the end of the lease is quite low. I would prefer six-month leases with the possibility of renewal. Recently, I broke up with my partner, with whom I was not married, but with whom I had a common lease. Even though I told the landlord that I left because I was so scared, he refuses to remove my name from the lease. The owner can issue an AST for up to seven years, I believe. But I would never advise a landlord to lease for that long. Six months to start and then a possible extension of 12 months, or allowed to convert into a legal periodic rent and run on, but not so long AST – the reason why a tenant is difficult to distribute if nothing is really bad in rent, like long-term rent arrears. In terms of protecting your position, I do not think there is much. I generally suggest that landlords, whenever possible, are flexible with respect to the establishment, depending on the tenant. Many of the owners I work with now only provide carpets and curtains, because there are fewer opportunities for theft or damage, so it`s really a matter of choice. Whatever you are responsible for replacing or repairing anything if the lease starts, it should break later.
The agency has just presented tenants with a new draft tenancy agreement with a two-month break clause on both sides. Assuming they sign this and it is dated, will everything be covered? I generally expect the owner to pay for the deal, and let`s be honest, for $1.50, is it worth arguing about? You can buy a blank agreement from a good mail or legal stationery documents, several owners` associations have one available to members, or you can download a free framework agreement from this site (residentiallandlord.com/tenancyintro.htm). Excuse me, I`m not sure what you`re asking. Will you provide them with Section 21, with a full two-month notice and rental dates? You can always say that you will release them prematurely if they wish. Section 21 can be written by hand, but must use concrete formulations in the sense: I guess the owner does not tell us the truth about his personal disaster and has simply decided to sell the house. Do we have rights to prevent him from respecting our oral agreement? It really depends on the point of view, do you want to secure your ability to hunt quickly, or encourage tenants not to move forward? I always feel that if I were a tenant, I would like a new lease in the short term, so I would have the security to know that, provided I pay the rent and not break the lease, the landlord could not get me out in less than six months. On the other hand, as a landlord, I want a legal lease, because I know that tenants could be evacuated fairly quickly if I correctly served two months in the pre-announcement relationship. If you are a landlord who is probably away for a few months and wants to make sure your property is protected, a rental agreement may mean that tenants are more likely to stay for the full term of the contract. My first reaction is that it would be a residential property, but then you wonder what the last sentence implies. If environmental services were included to ensure that they met all the standards required for a residence, that would be housing. A close relative has a small factory in a renovated pub.
He equipped the first floor as accommodation and rented the rooms with the agreement of the environmental services.